Non zero sumness


The best argument for developing supplier relationships involves the concept of non zero sumness i.e. by working together, we can achieve benefits that are beyond the sum of what we could get working separately.

In game theory, non zero sumness is crucial in determining how people play the games – e.g. divide the benefits amongst them.

In reality, people behave according to a number of factors, one of which is a conscious calculation of their costs versus their benefits. Most factors are unconscious, but we’ll leave that one for a later post.

Constant blame (the default setting) generally leads people to dig in, both at an individual level and organizational level. Incentives for cooperation and openness are achievable albeit rare. So, if we are to create a significant jump in profits/performance/improvement by working together, we need to have keep non zero sumness in the forefront of our minds. Conscious over unconscious. For some…impossible, but for some, a goal worth pursuing.

Now, I just need to throw in a line about football, so that lots of people check out this post. Google, are you listening?

English: Ehud Kalai is a prominent American ga...


Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: